Re: BUG #14830: Missed NOTIFications, PostgreSQL 9.1.24

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #14830: Missed NOTIFications, PostgreSQL 9.1.24
Date: 2017-10-10 14:19:48
Message-ID: 16671.1507645188@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm ... I suppose it's possible that that happens if the listening
>> backend isn't executing any SQL commands but is just sitting.
>> While that might describe your test harness, does it describe any
>> real-world application?

> I think it's not totally unreasonable to have processes sitting idle for
> long periods of time.

Sure, but if they're truly idle, they aren't looking at RecentXmin ;-)

> Would they not recompute RecentXmin if they did a
> sinval reset?

Not sure, but if not, maybe making that code path update it would be
a suitable fix in practice? I'm a bit hesitant to put a GetSnapshotData
call into ProcessIncomingNotify, because of the possibility of adding a
lot of contention on the ProcArray if there's very heavy notify traffic.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Дилян Палаузов 2017-10-10 14:31:40 ./configure error: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type
Previous Message John McKown 2017-10-10 14:19:17 Re: please quote POSTGRESQL