From: | yangtao <yangtaoyours(at)126(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re:Re: timestamptz test failed by postgresql 6.5.0 |
Date: | 2021-01-04 06:41:45 |
Message-ID: | 164acded.2d24.176cc215672.Coremail.yangtaoyours@126.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
em~~~, I read the release notes [1] right now.
I try my best fix it as you suggested, and persuade my partners to not use version 9.6.0.
Thanks for your help!
Best Regards!
Tao
At 2021-01-04 14:36:30, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>yangtao <yangtaoyours(at)126(dot)com> writes:
>> Yes, I compile it by configure --with-system-tzdata, should I remove it?
>> What's more, because some other components dependency, I must use version 9.6.0.
>
>No. For god's sake, fix whatever components you are using that think
>they must have 9.6.0 rather than 9.6.later. Read the release notes [1].
>Insisting on 9.6.0 four years later is professional malpractice.
>
>(I'll not even get into the question of whether you should be installing
>some later release branch than 9.6.x; but I can't help noting that 9.6's
>EOL is 11 months away.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/release/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thiemo Kellner | 2021-01-04 10:08:08 | Re: Possible trigger bug? function call argument literalised |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-01-04 06:36:30 | Re: timestamptz test failed by postgresql 6.5.0 |