Re:Re: timestamptz test failed by postgresql 6.5.0

From: yangtao <yangtaoyours(at)126(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:Re: timestamptz test failed by postgresql 6.5.0
Date: 2021-01-04 06:41:45
Message-ID: 164acded.2d24.176cc215672.Coremail.yangtaoyours@126.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

em~~~, I read the release notes [1] right now.
I try my best fix it as you suggested, and persuade my partners to not use version 9.6.0.
Thanks for your help!

Best Regards!
Tao

At 2021-01-04 14:36:30, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>yangtao <yangtaoyours(at)126(dot)com> writes:
>> Yes, I compile it by configure --with-system-tzdata, should I remove it?
>> What's more, because some other components dependency, I must use version 9.6.0.
>
>No. For god's sake, fix whatever components you are using that think
>they must have 9.6.0 rather than 9.6.later. Read the release notes [1].
>Insisting on 9.6.0 four years later is professional malpractice.
>
>(I'll not even get into the question of whether you should be installing
>some later release branch than 9.6.x; but I can't help noting that 9.6's
>EOL is 11 months away.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/release/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thiemo Kellner 2021-01-04 10:08:08 Re: Possible trigger bug? function call argument literalised
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-01-04 06:36:30 Re: timestamptz test failed by postgresql 6.5.0