Re: Building pg_xlogdump reproducibly

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christoph Berg <christoph(dot)berg(at)credativ(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Building pg_xlogdump reproducibly
Date: 2016-01-05 15:03:45
Message-ID: 16458.1452006225@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christoph Berg <christoph(dot)berg(at)credativ(dot)de> writes:
> Re: Alvaro Herrera 2016-01-04 <20160104175623(dot)GA170910(at)alvherre(dot)pgsql>
>> I don't see any other $(wildcard) used to build executables; it's used
>> for tests and flags in many places, but that shouldn't matter.

> Nod. Attached is a patch that covers all relevant $(wildcard)
> occurrences in Makefiles for devel.

There was some upthread discussion of trying to centralize this logic
in a macro, but I think this patch is good as-is. A macro wouldn't
really add any readability, nor would it do much to help us remember
to do the right thing in future places that might need this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-01-05 15:28:25 Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-01-05 14:57:58 Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches