Re: double and numeric conversion

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: double and numeric conversion
Date: 2010-03-03 10:28:15
Message-ID: 162867791003030228n67a4111t4fdd9dc33346efa4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/3/3 Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
>>
>> I didn't look deeply at the postgres internals to see if there was a way
>> to do double -> numeric and integer-types -> numeric without intermediary
>> string format.  If that sort of thing is easy to leverage, I'd be happy to
>> share the code.
>>
>
> I think your code could be valuable for postgres on the fact alone that it
> is almost twice as fast, and probably easy to integrate and unit test. We
> make heavy use of the numeric data type, so I'm very interested!

I did some test and numeric->double is about 5% faster than
numeric->string->double (on my PC)

Regards
Pavel Stehule

>
> regards
> Yeb Havinga
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2010-03-03 10:57:14 Re: double and numeric conversion
Previous Message Yeb Havinga 2010-03-03 10:01:20 Re: double and numeric conversion