Re: quoting psql varible as identifier

2010/1/18 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> 2010/1/18 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I rewrote patch so now interface for PQescapeIdentConn is same as
>>>> PQescapeStringConn
>>>>
>>>> @3. I though so the protection under incomplete multibyte chars are
>>>> enought - missing bytes are replaced by space - like
>>>> PQescapeStringConn does.
>>>
>>> That much is fine, but the output buffer is only guaranteed to be of
>>> size 2n+1.  Imagine the input is two double-quotes followed by a byte
>>> for which pg_encoding_mblen() returns 4.  The input is 3 characters
>>> long so the user was responsible to provide 7 bytes of output space,
>>> but you'll try to write 9 bytes to it (including the terminating NUL).
>>>
>> I don't understand. The "length" is number of bytes, not number of
>> chars. It is maybe bad documented only. If your input string has 6
>> bytes, then buffer have to allocated to 13 bytes. Nobody knows how
>> much is chars there.
>
> Right, but the point is we can't assume that the input is validly
> encoded.  If the input ends with a garbage character that looks like
> the start of a multi-byte character, we can't assume that there's
> enough space in the output buffer to store the required number of
> padding spaces.
>
> To take an extreme example, suppose there were an encoding where any
> time the first byte of a multi-byte character has the high-bit set,
> the character is 100 bytes long.  Then suppose someone call
> PQescapeStringConn(), or this new function we're adding, with a length
> argument of 1, and the first byte of the input buffer has the high-bit
> set.  The caller is only required to provide a 3-byte output buffer,
> and the third byte is needed for the terminating NUL.  That means that
> after we copy that first character we only have room to insert one
> padding space.  The way you had it coded, since we were expecting a
> character 100 bytes long, we'd always try to insert 99 padding spaces.
>

do you speak about previous version?

in current version is garanted new length is <= 2x original length

Pavel

>
>> Let me take a crack at this and post a patch.  We're making this
>>> harder than it needs to be.
>>
>> sure, please.
>
> Working on it...
>
> ...Robert
>