From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: plpgsql: open for execute - add USING clause |
Date: | 2009-11-17 20:52:17 |
Message-ID: | 162867790911171252x7765845dld2fcc84269e76768@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/11/17 Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> 2009/11/17 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>>> This is now the fourth patch you've submitted since the start of
>>> the CommitFest...
>>>
>>
>> These patches are for next commitfest. What I know, the current
>> commitfest is closed for new patches. Is it ok?
>
> Until this moment I was unconvinced of the need for a strict rule that
> patches from regular submitters who don't suspend patch development
> to contribute to the commitfest reviews should be ignored.
what is wrong?
Patches typmodes for functions and enhancing psql was notificated in proposal:
*http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-11/msg00934.php
*http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00519.php
(more than one moth old)
patch for OPEN EXECUTE USING is reaction on Tom's mail
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-11/msg00713.php (for
me it is like a proposal) and this patch is +/- bugfix.
I don't wont to apply these patches tomorrow, I don't sending these
patches for last moment. If I have to wait one weak or two weeks, ok.
Declare it. I'll respect it. But actually I respecting all rules, what
I know.
I don't would to generate thousand patches now. Simply I have a time
for postgres now. I wrote three patches. And I put it to commitfest,
because I thing so this work is serious. So anybody can comment it, so
anybody can test it. I put it to commitfest application, because this
code is finished (or finished for reviewing) and I would lost these
patches in this mailing list. Tomorrow I could be killed (maybe),
tomorrow I could to lost data in my hardisc. I have not other patches.
Don't afraid.
Pavel
>
> -Kevin
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-11-17 20:58:26 | Re: plpgsql: open for execute - add USING clause |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-11-17 20:33:08 | Re: plpgsql: open for execute - add USING clause |