Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types

2009/9/11 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> Aidan Van Dyk escribió:
>
>> Just to make the task that much harder, if PostgreSQL is going to have a
>> sprintf (in core, or contrib), I *really* hope it's a real sprintf,
>> supporting everything, like:
>>    $m positional notation
>>    * width argument
>>    All the flags [#0- +'] (I as a bonus)
>>    field width . presision
>>
>> And you're going to want to make sure you support all the regular
>> conversion specifiers (d/i/o/u/x/X/e/E/f/F/g/G/p/n/c/s)...
>
> Is this really all that hard?  I'm thinking it could be implemented by
> using the real C sprintf underneath, passing one % specifier and its
> corresponding parameter at a time, coerced to whatever the conversion
> specifier specifies.

What conversion between PostgreSQL datatypes and C types? PostgreSQL
missing infrastructure for it.

Pavel
>
> The only thing that breaks this idea is the $n positional specifiers, I
> think.
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
>