Re: proposal: add columns created and altered to pg_proc and pg_class

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: add columns created and altered to pg_proc and pg_class
Date: 2009-04-14 04:07:02
Message-ID: 162867790904132107h60defa9dq183c53798e647a08@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/4/14 Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>:
>
>>> - what if I need to know about operators, operator classes, schemas, etc
>>>  etc
>>
>> Fine, let's log this info for those too (or else decide they're too
>> obscure and don't - pg_class and pg_proc are certainly the most
>> interesting cases).
>
> I would suggest putting this info in a separate table, pg_change.  It would
> have oid, catalog, user_changed, changed_on.  That way we could simply keep
> the data for all objects which have an OID.
>
> This would also supposedly allow us to track drops if we wanted.
>
> We'd have to check on overhead of this, though, and maybe make it a GUC to
> track it.
>
> This would also be tremendously useful to suppliment replication systems.
>

I though about it too. But I am not sure, if this isn't too
complicated solution for simple task. If I thing little bit more -
main important is timestamp of last change.

regards
Pavel Stehule

> --
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
> www.pgexperts.com
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2009-04-14 04:07:27 Re: Unicode support
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-04-14 03:58:59 Re: proposal: add columns created and altered to pg_proc and pg_class