Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables
Date: 2003-04-16 06:10:04
Message-ID: 15923.1050473404@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> Maybe VACUUM FULL could reorder index pages and truncate to recover disk
> space. But this is very costly, so there could be a "VACUUM REALLY
> FULL" or something :-)

At that point I would think REINDEX would be a better answer.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-04-16 06:11:17 Re: encoding question
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-16 05:57:19 Re: Foreign Database Connectivity