| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: obsolete example |
| Date: | 2019-11-22 00:39:34 |
| Message-ID: | 15911.1574383174@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> No objections from here, let's get rid of it. The docs actually make
> use of the V1 versions, and funcs_new.c is not even compiled (it does
> compile). Any objections to the attached? On top of moving the file,
> there is one comment to update and a sentence to remove. Some
> progress is always better than no progress.
+1
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-11-22 00:49:03 | Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-11-22 00:13:20 | Re: obsolete example |