Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2018-02-27 09:33:04
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attached an updated version in which I incorporated some of the revisions
that David Rowley suggested to OR clauses handling (in partprune.c) that
he posted as a separate patch on the run-time pruning thread [1].



Attachment Content-Type Size
v34-0001-Add-partcollation-and-partsupfunc-to-PartitionSc.patch text/plain 4.4 KB
v34-0002-Faster-partition-pruning.patch text/plain 112.3 KB
v34-0003-Add-only-unpruned-partitioned-child-rels-to-part.patch text/plain 23.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-02-27 09:39:47 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Previous Message Jeevan Chalke 2018-02-27 09:29:18 Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping