From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
Date: | 2018-02-27 09:33:04 |
Message-ID: | 158f04ce-9deb-0457-ddcc-78fb73db4ebc@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Attached an updated version in which I incorporated some of the revisions
that David Rowley suggested to OR clauses handling (in partprune.c) that
he posted as a separate patch on the run-time pruning thread [1].
Thanks,
Amit
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v34-0001-Add-partcollation-and-partsupfunc-to-PartitionSc.patch | text/plain | 4.4 KB |
v34-0002-Faster-partition-pruning.patch | text/plain | 112.3 KB |
v34-0003-Add-only-unpruned-partitioned-child-rels-to-part.patch | text/plain | 23.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-02-27 09:39:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning |
Previous Message | Jeevan Chalke | 2018-02-27 09:29:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping |