| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: raw output from copy |
| Date: | 2016-03-29 20:33:06 |
| Message-ID: | 15768.1459283586@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> The I would suggest we try to invent something for psql which does help
> with it. I just don't see this as an SQL problem.
There's certainly a lot to be said for that approach. I'm still not
convinced that we can make COPY do this without creating compatibility
issues, regardless of the details; and it doesn't seem like a big
enough problem to be worth taking any risks of that sort.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2016-03-29 20:48:00 | Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff |
| Previous Message | Paul Ramsey | 2016-03-29 20:32:59 | Re: Parallel Queries and PostGIS |