Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Sigh. From the first day when JOHAB was supported (back to 7.3 days),
> it should had not been in the server encodings. JOHAB's second byte
> definitely contain 0x41 and above. *johab*.map just reflect the
> fact. I think we should remove JOHAB from the server encodings list.
> I'm afraid users who have JOHAB encoded databases get angry, though.
I think the best way to proceed is probably to fix this in HEAD but
not back-patch it. During a dump and reload the encoding can be
corrected to something safe.
regards, tom lane