From: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums |
Date: | 2019-03-12 10:13:46 |
Message-ID: | 1552385626.4947.50.camel@credativ.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Am Montag, den 11.03.2019, 14:11 +0000 schrieb Sergei Kornilov:
> > if (badblocks > 0)
> > return 1;
>
> Small question: why return 1 instead of exit(1)?
I have a feeling it is project policy to return 0 from main(), and
exit(1) if a program aborts with an error.
In the above case, the program finishes more-or-less as intended (no
abort), but due to errors found on the way, does not return with 0.
I don't mind either way and probably exit(1) makes more sense, but I
wanted to explain why it is like that.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Projektleiter / Senior Berater
Tel.: +49 2166 9901-171
Fax: +49 2166 9901-100
Email: michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de
credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080
USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209
Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer
Unser Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten unterliegt
folgenden Bestimmungen: https://www.credativ.de/datenschutz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Arthur Zakirov | 2019-03-12 10:16:14 | Re: Adding a TAP test checking data consistency on standby with minRecoveryPoint |
Previous Message | Sergei Kornilov | 2019-03-12 10:06:55 | Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums |