Re: PG levels vs. syslog levels

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG levels vs. syslog levels
Date: 2007-09-20 22:00:52
Message-ID: 15438.1190325652@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> writes:
> What is the correlation between PostgreSQL log severity levels and
> syslog levels?

Hmm, doesn't seem to be documented anywhere, but a look into the source
code finds

switch (edata->elevel)
{
case DEBUG5:
case DEBUG4:
case DEBUG3:
case DEBUG2:
case DEBUG1:
syslog_level = LOG_DEBUG;
break;
case LOG:
case COMMERROR:
case INFO:
syslog_level = LOG_INFO;
break;
case NOTICE:
case WARNING:
syslog_level = LOG_NOTICE;
break;
case ERROR:
syslog_level = LOG_WARNING;
break;
case FATAL:
syslog_level = LOG_ERR;
break;
case PANIC:
default:
syslog_level = LOG_CRIT;
break;
}

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-09-20 22:05:38 Re: Adding domain type with CHECK constraints slow on large table
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2007-09-20 21:33:25 Re: autovacuum