| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ECPGset_var |
| Date: | 2010-01-26 17:29:35 |
| Message-ID: | 15297.1264526975@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> Michael Meskes rta:
>> Zoltan, could you please look into this:
>> http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=dugong&dt=2010-01-26%2011:05:01 ?
>> Apparently dugong creates the ECPGset_var statements in a different order than
>> the other archs.
> It seems mongoose also fails the same way,
> the common factor seems to be ICC, other machines
> with various GCC versions are green . I'll look into it.
The problem is you've got calls like this:
$$ = cat_str(4,
adjust_outofscope_cursor_vars(this, true),
adjust_outofscope_cursor_vars(this, false),
make_str("ECPG_informix_reset_sqlca();"),
comment);
in which the order of evaluation of cat_str's parameters is unspecified,
but adjust_outofscope_cursor_vars has got order-dependent side effects.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-26 17:36:13 | Re: Review: listagg aggregate |
| Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2010-01-26 17:19:17 | testing cvs HEAD - HS/SR - missing file |