Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL Standard

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL Standard
Date: 2018-06-11 19:03:39
Message-ID: 15200.1528743819@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2018-Jun-10, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (wanders away wondering exactly what parsing technology the SQL committee
>> thinks implementations use...)

> Umm, doesn't this come from our decision to make the AS optional there?

No, it was THEIR decision to make AS optional. I'd like to think that
we'd never have done anything so stupid if we were designing the syntax.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-06-11 19:38:57 Re: automating perl compile time checking
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2018-06-11 18:51:21 Re: Proposal: Partitioning Advisor for PostgreSQL