From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Making type Datum be 8 bytes everywhere |
Date: | 2025-07-30 15:48:08 |
Message-ID: | 1517712.1753890488@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 at 22:00, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I'm disinclined to put in a huge amount of effort looking for the
>> worst case. We established long ago that we weren't going to
>> optimize for 32-bit anymore. So as long as this doesn't completely
>> tank performance on 32-bit, I'm satisfied. I'd almost say that
>> if standard pgbench doesn't notice the change, that's good enough.
> I did a basic pgbench benchmark on a 32-bit build and there is no change.
Thanks for doing that! For me, that's enough evidence to move
forward.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2025-07-30 15:51:58 | Assertion failure in pgbench |
Previous Message | Xuneng Zhou | 2025-07-30 15:42:10 | Re: Add progressive backoff to XactLockTableWait functions |