Re: pgsql: Add wait event for fsync of WAL segments

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add wait event for fsync of WAL segments
Date: 2018-07-09 15:16:23
Message-ID: 14633.1531149383@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 10:23:37PM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>> I just noticed that the number of rows for the IO wait event type
>> documentation hasn't been updated, see
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/monitoring-stats.html#WAIT-EVENT-TABLE.
>> Trivial patch attached.

> Thanks, Julien! Fixed. Indeed the table format was weird..

Hm, do we need that "morerows" thing at all? It seems impossible
that we'll remember to keep it up to date in future. How do you
even check that it's right now?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-07-09 15:19:31 pgsql: rel notes: mention enabling of parallelism in PG 10
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-07-09 12:17:29 pgsql: Add UtilityReturnsTuples() support for CALL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-07-09 15:19:28 Re: add default parallel query to v10 release notes? (Re: [PERFORM] performance drop after upgrade (9.6 > 10))
Previous Message Charles Cui 2018-07-09 14:54:23 Re: [GSoC] working status