Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
> I also noticed that the HPUX buildfarm members pademelon and gaur
> failed, with this:
> /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols:
> htonl (code)
> I will look into that too.
I think the critical part of their report is
scram-common.c: In function `scram_Hi':
scram-common.c:106: warning: implicit declaration of function `htonl'
There are two headers that we commonly include when wanting those
functions:
/* for ntohl/htonl */
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
I think you probably left out one or both.
regards, tom lane