Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Date: 2020-09-16 00:26:59
Message-ID: 1423744.1600216019@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> They get moderated because the noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org address which
> appears as sender is not subscribed to any list.

Ah-hah.

> I also added that
> address to the whitelist now, but whether that's a great fix in the long
> run is debatable.

Can/should we change the address that originates such messages?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2020-09-16 01:29:50 Re: Optimising compactify_tuples()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-09-16 00:16:26 Re: Subscription test 013_partition.pl fails under CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS