Re: Reindex vs Vacuum analyze

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vincent Janelle <random(at)goblinstudios(dot)com>
Cc: "Gaetano Mendola" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reindex vs Vacuum analyze
Date: 2002-11-02 00:25:33
Message-ID: 14106.1036196733@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Vincent Janelle <random(at)goblinstudios(dot)com> writes:
> when entries are deleted from an table they're not deleted from the
> index, and vacuum doesn't clean them up.

This is entirely false.

There is a problem with recovering space in an index if the range of
indexed values changes over time. But claiming that we don't delete
index entries is just plain wrong.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-02 03:37:34 Re: my.cnf to postgresql.conf Conversion
Previous Message Naomi Walker 2002-11-01 23:57:42 Re: loading and unloading rows