Re: LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines
Date: 2017-08-30 13:24:28
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> It doesn't seems to make sense to consider this patch unless we get access
> to suitable Power machine to reproduce benefits.
> This is why I'm going to mark this patch "Returned with feedback".
> Once we would get access to the appropriate machine, I will resubmit this
> patch.

What about hydra (that 60-core POWER7 machine we have community
access to)?

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-08-30 13:33:13 Re: [PATCH] Fix drop replication slot blocking instead of returning error
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-08-30 13:22:46 Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order