Re: Development schedule

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Development schedule
Date: 2005-02-25 22:04:30
Message-ID: 13752.1109369070@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> If this were an ordinary devel cycle then I'd be fine with it running a
>> year, but I think we really do need to plan for a shorter than normal
>> cycle so we can clean up 8.0 kinks in a reasonably timely fashion.

> Let's see how much 8.0 cleanup we need. At this point I haven't seen
> any major things needing cleanup.

However, people are asking us for a schedule target now; "wait and see"
isn't the answer they need. My feeling is that we should bet on there
being some issues, rather than bet on there not being any.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-02-25 22:09:20 Re: Development schedule
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-02-25 22:00:12 Re: Development schedule