| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
| Date: | 2017-08-14 18:00:57 |
| Message-ID: | 13673.1502733657@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
>>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> I do not think it is CREATE COLLATION's job to provide a comment;
>>>> no other CREATE command does so.
> I must admit that I missed that the description was cataloged as a
> comment. Is it out of the question to add another column to
> pg_collation, that just always has the ICU-provided description? These
> seem like separate concerns to me.
That seems like a reasonable solution to me, if it's not too late
for another catversion bump. I like it better than the auto-comment
thing Peter E. suggests nearby.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-08-14 18:14:59 | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-14 17:45:06 | Re: BUG #14775: Incorrect documentation for the Commit logical replication message format |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-08-14 18:14:59 | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-08-14 17:57:40 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't force-assign transaction id when exporting a snapshot. |