| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: prepared transaction isolation tests |
| Date: | 2020-08-19 02:24:20 |
| Message-ID: | 1362921.1597803860@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> ISTM we should just add an alternative output for disabled prepared
> xacts, and re-add the test?
I believe the buildfarm runs the isolation step with "make installcheck",
so if you're hoping to get buildfarm coverage that way, you're mistaken.
Having said that, it'd probably be good if "make check" did run this test.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-08-19 02:34:00 | Re: prepared transaction isolation tests |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-08-19 01:22:57 | prepared transaction isolation tests |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-08-19 02:34:00 | Re: prepared transaction isolation tests |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-08-19 01:22:57 | prepared transaction isolation tests |