Re: Oid registry

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oid registry
Date: 2012-09-26 00:35:05
Message-ID: 1348619705.13797.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 18:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Actually, after reading another message you sent, I thought you were
> going to respond that your proposed transforms feature would cover it.

I had thought about this some time ago, but it's clearer to think of
casts as associating two types, versus transforms associating a type and
a language. JSON and XML tend to be types.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-09-26 00:36:07 Re: Oid registry
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-09-26 00:30:59 htup header reorganization breaks many extension modules