Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Ensure age() returns a stable value rather than the latest value

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Ensure age() returns a stable value rather than the latest value
Date: 2012-05-14 19:05:21
Message-ID: 1337022321.19946.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On lör, 2012-05-12 at 12:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Now it's entirely likely that there is nobody out there relying on
> such a thing, but nonetheless this is a compatibility break, and an
> unnecessary one IMO. You haven't shown any convincing reason why we
> need to change the behavior of age() on master servers at all.

Recall that this thread originally arose out of age() being called by a
monitoring tool. It would be nice if repeatedly calling age() on an
otherwise idle database would not change the result. Currently, you
would never get a "stable" state on such a check, and moreover, you
would not only get different results but different long-term behavior
between master and standby. Now this is not that important and can be
accommodated in the respective tools, but it is kind of weird. It would
be like a check for disk space losing one byte at every check, even if
you got it back later.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-05-14 19:11:44 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Ensure age() returns a stable value rather than the latest value
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-05-14 19:03:21 pgsql: For testing purposes, reinsert a timeout in pgstat.c's wait call

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-05-14 19:11:44 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Ensure age() returns a stable value rather than the latest value
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2012-05-14 18:34:12 Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication