Re: Configuration include directory

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Greg Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Configuration include directory
Date: 2011-11-17 13:34:48
Message-ID: 1321536869-sup-6275@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié nov 16 22:52:35 -0300 2011:

> (Do we guard against recursive inclusion via plain old include? If
> not, maybe this isn't worth worrying about.)

Yes, we do

FATAL: could not open configuration file "foo.conf": maximum nesting depth exceeded

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2011-11-17 13:53:42 Re: SQLDA fix for ECPG
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-11-17 13:28:20 Re: Removing postgres -f command line option