Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
Date: 2011-08-04 18:00:11
Message-ID: 1312480811.24208.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2011-08-04 at 14:44 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> 2011-08-04 14:32 keltezéssel, Robert Haas írta:
> > 2011/8/4 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>:
> >> Shouldn't these get fixed to be consistent?
> > I believe I already did. See commit 85b436f7b1f06a6ffa8d2f29b03d6e440de18784.
>
> I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g' -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run
> so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get
> converted so the whole source tree is consistent.

I would be in favor of that.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-08-04 18:03:59 Re: mosbench revisited
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-08-04 17:57:54 Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints