| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID |
| Date: | 2011-06-16 00:08:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1308182350-sup-9801@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié jun 15 19:32:29 -0400 2011:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Here's an updated patch fixing all of the above. I stole your first
> > test case and added it to regression, after some editorialization.
>
> I've probably created some merge conflicts for you in process of fixing
> the FOREIGN KEY NOT VALID patch, but in any case you need to change this
> to use ConstraintAttributeSpec rather than a duplicate production.
Yeah, nothing serious. Updated patch attached. The wording in the doc
changes could probably use some look over.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| not-valid-check-5.patch | application/octet-stream | 49.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-06-16 00:52:12 | Symbols and versioning of binary releases; running a symbol server |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-06-15 23:33:55 | Re: Strict Set Returning Functions |