Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Date: 2011-06-06 22:53:38
Message-ID: 1307400758-sup-1570@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie jun 03 09:17:08 -0400 2011:
> I've now spent enough time working on this issue now to be convinced
> that the approach has merit, if we can work out the kinks. I'll start
> with some performance numbers.

I hereby recommend that people with patches such as this one while on
the last weeks till release should refrain from posting them until the
release has actually taken place.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-06-06 23:11:14 Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2011-06-06 22:30:53 Re: heap vacuum & cleanup locks