Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?

From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(dot)berkus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Date: 2011-05-13 23:53:16
Message-ID: 1305330796.2359.17.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 19:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
> It should be okay to move, since the -devel subpackage requires the
> main one. Therefore there is no configuration in which pg_config
> would be present before and missing after the change.

Thanks Tom. I can make this change in next build set.

Regards,

--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-05-14 00:45:14 Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT
Previous Message Alexey Klyukin 2011-05-13 23:29:43 Re: 'tuple concurrently updated' error for alter role ... set