Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(dot)berkus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Date: 2011-05-12 23:37:32
Message-ID: 12922.1305243452@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> writes:
> I'm not sure that I can move it to main package in 9.0 package set, I
> need to make sure that I won't break anything. But it is pretty doable
> for 9.1.

It should be okay to move, since the -devel subpackage requires the main
one. Therefore there is no configuration in which pg_config would be
present before and missing after the change.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-05-12 23:54:45 Re: Bug #6005
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-05-12 23:34:54 Re: Bug #6005