Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works
Date: 2018-09-12 17:40:01
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> I would have liked to look at this patch in details, but it failed to
> apply. Could you rebase?

Ah, yeah, the dlopen patch touched a couple of the same places.
Rebase attached --- no substantive changes.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-create-strerror-wrapper-2.patch text/x-diff 28.6 KB
0002-migrate-percent-m-implementation-2.patch text/x-diff 45.5 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-09-12 18:11:18 Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons
Previous Message Michael Banck 2018-09-12 17:34:07 Re: Postgres 11 release notes