Re: ALTER TYPE COLLATABLE?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: ALTER TYPE COLLATABLE?
Date: 2011-03-01 16:47:39
Message-ID: 1298998059.30816.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2011-02-18 at 11:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> While testing a fix for this, I observe that pg_dump is entirely
> broken on the subject, because it fails to dump anything at all about
> the typcollation property when dumping a base type.

This is now fixed.

> I also rather wonder
> exactly what pg_dump would dump to restore a value of
> pg_type.typcollation that's not either 0 or 100.

It does what pg_dump does with other unrecognized or invalid type
attributes: it ignores them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-03-01 16:50:53 Re: pl/python custom datatype parsers
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-03-01 16:36:06 Re: OSSP gone missing? Fate of UUID?