Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Date: 2011-02-24 15:06:17
Message-ID: 1298559876-sup-6276@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of mié feb 23 21:35:13 -0300 2011:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié feb 23 19:39:23 -0300 2011:

> > My recollection is that this was pretty tightly coupled to the wCTE
> > patch. I had been intending to review them together, and have just
> > now come up for air enough to start doing that. Do you really want
> > to review this one separately?
>
> Dunno. If you're gonna pick it up I guess my time is best spent
> elsewhere. There was some restructuring in code in postgres.c to be
> done near this patch, which wasn't attacked at all by Marko AFAICS.
> Maybe I should be looking at that instead.

... but then, if I did that, I could create merge conflicts for you, so
please have at it. I think pure beautification code cleanups can way
till 9.2 starts.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-02-24 15:07:35 Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Previous Message rsmogura 2011-02-24 15:03:19 Re: Binary in/out for aclitem