From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Snapshot synchronization, again... |
Date: | 2011-02-19 01:12:59 |
Message-ID: | 1298077237-sup-4499@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Joachim Wieland's message of vie feb 18 21:41:51 -0300 2011:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > 1. why are you using the expansible char array stuff instead of using
> > the StringInfo facility?
> >
> > 2. is md5 the most appropriate digest for this? If you need a
> > cryptographically secure hash, do we need something stronger? If not,
> > why not just use hash_any?
>
> We don't need a cryptographically secure hash.
Ok.
> Should I send an updated patch? Anything else?
No need, I'm halfway through already.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-19 01:20:14 | Re: disposition of remaining patches |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-02-19 00:51:20 | Re: Sync Rep v17 |