| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Large SGML Cleanup |
| Date: | 2010-11-03 13:19:47 |
| Message-ID: | 1288790275-sup-8458@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Excerpts from Josh Kupershmidt's message of mié nov 03 10:12:28 -0300 2010:
> Yes, it would be very nice to do this once we have all the HTML output
> fixed up to be valid.
>
> The w3c-markup-validator package I installed actually installs some
> CGI scripts under apache, and the Perl package I used had to
> communicate with it as a web service to get validation results. Pretty
> clunky IMO, and not great as a dependency for "make check", though
> maybe there's a standalone validator out there.
I tried with the wdg-html-validator package and it seems to be much
simpler to use. I just invoke it as "/usr/bin/validate *.html"
And yes, your patch does indeed fix a large amount of the validation
problems.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-11-03 14:24:38 | Re: Large SGML Cleanup |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-11-03 13:14:47 | Re: Large SGML Cleanup |