Re: Accounting for metapages in genericcostestimate()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Accounting for metapages in genericcostestimate()
Date: 2025-04-30 13:46:07
Message-ID: 1284442.1746020767@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> writes:
> On 2025-Apr-28, Tom Lane wrote:
>> + BlockNumber numNonLeafPages; /* # of index pages that are not leafs */

> I find the use of "leafs" as plural for "leaf" a bit strange ...
> We already have uses of that word, but I wonder if they don't mostly
> or exclusively come from non-native English speakers.

Yeah, "leaves" would be correct, but I wondered whether that'd confuse
non-native speakers more. Happy to change it though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Junwang Zhao 2025-04-30 14:07:36 Re: Introduce some randomness to autovacuum
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2025-04-30 13:34:28 Re: Some problems regarding the self-join elimination code