Re: ICU fixed digit reordering bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ICU fixed digit reordering bug
Date: 2026-10-27 21:39:52
Message-ID: 1279138.1793137192@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> There have been various reports over time that ICU collations that
> reorder digits are buggy. ...
> This issue was finally fixed in ICU 79, which came out a few days ago.
> I have confirmed that the PostgreSQL issue is fixed with that new version.

> The question now is whether there is anything else we want to do about this?

> 0. Do nothing. Leave the ICU bug and possibly this email as reference
> and recommend that users don't use the affected kinds of ICU locales
> with the affected older ICU versions.

I like option 0. It can't be incumbent on us to provide defenses
for every bug in every piece of software that we depend on ...
especially not edge-case bugs like this one seems to be.

If we had a surplus of time and people-power available, maybe it
would be reasonable to do something about this. But you know as
well as I do how horribly short we are on both.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2026-10-27 21:41:42 Re: ICU fixed digit reordering bug
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-10-27 21:30:34 Re: [DEPARSE] AT TIME ZONE and similar as a function in FROM do not read back