From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How about closing some Open Items? |
Date: | 2010-06-09 20:57:50 |
Message-ID: | 1276117070.23257.476.camel@ebony |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 11:34 +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> ...
> > Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
> ...
> > A lack of bugs usually indicates there are no bugs in the areas being
> > tested.
>
> Would the real Simon Riggs please speak up?
LOL, its me, flaws included.
> Isn't that precisely what
> "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" is meant to refute?
You snipped out the part where I give other possible explanations also,
so the two statements above do not counterpoise each other of themselves
in my original text. I stand by my whole statement, as intended.
Now, I think I misread Tom's comments. I agree with Tom that the new bug
discovery rate has fallen to zero and that probably indicates that no
new/ground-breaking tests are taking place.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-09 21:02:12 | parser handling of large object OIDs |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-09 20:48:00 | Re: Invalid YAML output from EXPLAIN |