| From: | Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mindaugas Riauba <ml(at)kilimas(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Zeus IOPS |
| Date: | 2010-06-01 13:17:31 |
| Message-ID: | 1275398251.6179.382.camel@bnicholson-desktop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 10:27 +0300, Mindaugas Riauba wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >>> Anybody on the list have any experience with these drives? They get
> >>> good numbers but I can't find diddly on them on the internet for the
> >>> last year or so.
> >>>
> >>> http://www.stec-inc.com/product/zeusiops.php
>
> Most of the storage vendors (I have confirmation from EMC and HP)
> use those in their SAN boxes. I believe that is because they are the
> only SLC SSD makers that have supercapacitors on the SSD drive which
> allows them to run with write cache enabled. As a side effect - they
> are insanely expensive. :)
Texas Memory Systems also have these.
--
Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-01 14:03:38 | Re: planner costs in "warm cache" tests |
| Previous Message | Matthew Wakeling | 2010-06-01 12:59:35 | Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL |