Re: Stale references to guc.c in comments/tests

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Stale references to guc.c in comments/tests
Date: 2023-02-28 23:00:34
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> Specifying the GUCs in question is a good idea, done in the attached. I'm not
> sure the phrasing is spot-on though, but I can't think of a better one. If you
> can think of a better one I'm all ears.

I'd just change "the definition of" to "the definitions of".
LGTM otherwise.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Imseih (AWS), Sami 2023-02-28 23:11:30 Re: Doc update for pg_stat_statements normalization
Previous Message Regina Obe 2023-02-28 22:59:16 RE: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts