Re: Fdw batch insert error out when set batch_size > 65535

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fdw batch insert error out when set batch_size > 65535
Date: 2021-06-09 06:05:46
Message-ID: 1271666.1623218746@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I've added a simple regression test to postgres_fdw, testing that batch
>> sizes > 65535 work fine, and pushed the fix.

> I was earlier thinking of adding one, but stopped because it might
> increase the regression test execution time. It looks like that's true
> - with and without the test case it takes 17 sec and 4 sec
> respectively on my dev system which is 4X slower. I'm not sure if this
> is okay.

The cost, versus the odds of ever detecting a problem, doesn't
seem like a good tradeoff.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2021-06-09 06:07:24 Re: logical decoding bug: segfault in ReorderBufferToastReplace()
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-06-09 05:46:45 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions