| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: submake-errcodes |
| Date: | 2018-04-12 13:49:58 |
| Message-ID: | 12600.1523540998@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> writes:
> Most of these work for me as well. The actual incantation via
> debian/rules fails, but I couldn't really narrow down what the
> difference is. Manually invoking the debian/rules targets:
For a moment I thought that this might be the critical difference:
> preparing build tree... done
ie that you're doing a VPATH build. But no, that case works as
expected too, for me.
The only conclusion I can come to is that you're using sources that
predate my recent makefile fixes, particularly 3b8f6e75f. Please
double-check that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-04-12 13:57:26 | Re: Bugs in TOAST handling, OID assignment and redo recovery |
| Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2018-04-12 13:47:52 | Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes |