Re: Python 3.1 support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Python 3.1 support
Date: 2009-11-13 11:47:13
Message-ID: 1258112833.7053.26.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2009-11-12 at 18:42 -0700, James Pye wrote:
> For me, plpython has never been what I would call a pleasure to use,
> and many of the gripes that I have with it are, IMO, entrenched far
> enough into the implementation that any efforts to change it
> would(should? =) cause unacceptable breakage in user applications(?).

Has this list of gripes ever been brought up and discussed in this
forum?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-11-13 12:14:37 Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-11-13 11:36:43 Re: Aggregate ORDER BY patch