Re: WIP: plpython3

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: plpython3
Date: 2009-07-24 17:29:53
Message-ID: 1248456593.4441.9.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 04:24 -0700, James Pye wrote:

> I see Python 3 as a good opportunity to change the interfaces and fix
> the design of the PL.
>
> I dunno. I have time to give it some TLC, and I'm not terribly excited
> about trying to tack features onto something that I find kinda gross.
>

If someone wants to actually take the time to create a better plpython,
I say more power to him. It is a bit unfortunate that it is tied
explicitly to python 3 but I can see advantages to that as well.

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-07-24 17:30:39 Re: When is a record NULL?
Previous Message Emanuel Calvo Franco 2009-07-24 17:23:42 Re: uuid contrib don't compile in OpenSolaris