| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.5 development schedule |
| Date: | 2009-07-01 07:58:06 |
| Message-ID: | 1246435086.27964.217.camel@dn-x300-willij |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 21:04 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > Given that there is also a lot of work on synchronous replication, is
> > it better to get the HS in so the SR stuff can use that as a baseline,
> > or to triage in both patches together?
>
> Whichever finishes first. Although they're very useful together, there
> is little if any code-level dependency between them. It would be
> dangerous to have one wait for the other, as one or the other could well
> be delayed for some reason. We can't even be sure that both are finished
> in time for 8.5.
Code dependency is not the main worry. Developer and committer time and
attention is our scarcest resource and I expect it to remain so.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-07-01 09:20:41 | Re: Extensions User Design |
| Previous Message | Damon Xu | 2009-07-01 07:44:26 | Questions regarding PostgreSQL warm backup. |