From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andy Lester <andy(at)petdance(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me |
Date: | 2009-05-01 19:37:19 |
Message-ID: | 1241206639.10434.11.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 12:09 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> I'd appreciate your making an argument, if you're going to, on the
> merits of the proposal at hand, rather than stooping to personal
> insult. You know better.
O.k. guys let's all take a breath here. We all have our favorite editors
and our favorite way of doing things. Frankly I think both emacs and vi
users are nuts. I found the light in joe years ago :). Regardless, I
agree with Tom that the idea of having decorators of any kind in source
or docs is a bad idea.
That being said, there is no reason why we can have a section of the
wiki that has .rc files for respective editors and environments that
conform to .Org coding conventions.
Peace.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-05-01 19:40:59 | Re: Table data exclusion patch for pg_dump |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-01 19:33:50 | Re: Table data exclusion patch for pg_dump |