Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andy Lester <andy(at)petdance(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me
Date: 2009-05-01 19:37:19
Message-ID: 1241206639.10434.11.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 12:09 -0700, David Fetter wrote:

> I'd appreciate your making an argument, if you're going to, on the
> merits of the proposal at hand, rather than stooping to personal
> insult. You know better.

O.k. guys let's all take a breath here. We all have our favorite editors
and our favorite way of doing things. Frankly I think both emacs and vi
users are nuts. I found the light in joe years ago :). Regardless, I
agree with Tom that the idea of having decorators of any kind in source
or docs is a bad idea.

That being said, there is no reason why we can have a section of the
wiki that has .rc files for respective editors and environments that
conform to .Org coding conventions.

Peace.

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2009-05-01 19:40:59 Re: Table data exclusion patch for pg_dump
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-05-01 19:33:50 Re: Table data exclusion patch for pg_dump